Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Toth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Toth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient notability for this encyclopaedia, does not begin to meet WP:ARTIST. He's a moderately competent commercial artist who will make you a bronze replica of your motorcycle if that's what you want, or a portrait of your doggie. He has no place here. NB: the article is now very short because all copyright-infringing content has been removed. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:50, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This website claims that some of his work has been in museums, but doesn't say which ones. If they're major enough museums and it's part of the permanent collection, he may pass on that criteria. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:29, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 19:51, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter¹²³ (announce) @ 20:22, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.